There’s a curious magic trick in finance: a return that appears when nothing happens. No news, no surprises, no change in price. Just carry—the part of a trade’s return that comes from standing still.
Currency traders have long known this sleight of hand. Borrow low-yielding yen, buy high-yielding Aussie dollars, collect the difference in interest income. Provided the exchange rate doesn’t move against you, it’s a nice consistent profit. Of course, sometimes it does move against you—like during a global panic—and the whole thing blows up. But until then, you look very clever.
What Koijen, Moskowitz, Pedersen, and Vrugt do in their paper Carry is ask a natural—but strangely under-asked—question: can you do this trick in everything? Not just FX, but equities, bonds, commodities, credit, and even options?
Spoiler: Yes. And not only can you—you probably should, because carry turns out to be a robust, mostly model-free, forward-looking predictor of returns. It’s also a quietly unifying force in the disjointed chaos of factor investing. Momentum, value, dividend yield, yield curve slope, basis—all those factors you know and love? Many of them are just different dialects of carry.
Carry is not a theory. It doesn’t require beliefs about the economy, discount rates, or marginal utility of consumption. It’s more primitive than that. Carry is simply the return you’d earn if the market went nowhere.
In practice:
In currencies: the interest rate differential.
In bonds: yield and roll-down.
In commodities: the basis.
In equities: expected dividends.
In options: theta and the term structure of implied volatility.
This makes carry observable—a rare virtue in a field drowning in models and second moments.
Expected returns, on the other hand, are not observable. They’re dreams, spreadsheets, and tears. The authors decompose expected return as:
Expected Return = Carry + Expected Price Change
The cleanest test of asset pricing models is whether carry alone explains realized return. If it does, your model has some explaining to do.
Answer: yes. Consistently and pervasively.
The authors apply carry strategies across nine asset classes, going long high-carry assets and short low-carry ones. Every single one makes money. The average Sharpe ratio within asset classes is 0.8. A diversified global carry portfolio hits 1.2.
This is not a backtest of clever rules on one market with look-ahead bias and a broken rebalancing assumption. This is nine very different markets, over multiple decades, using a clean and uniform definition. That’s not robustness; that’s bullying.
Carry not only predicts returns—it often subsumes traditional predictors in regressions. In many cases, value, momentum, and other staples of the quant pantry have nothing left once carry is taken into account.
You almost feel sorry for the factor zoo keepers—now reduced to actual zookeepers.
Of course, this isn’t risk-free arbitrage. You earn the carry premium by exposing yourself to certain risks. To collect a risk premium, you have to take risk.
Carry strategies generally do badly during:
Global recessions
Liquidity crunches
Volatility spikes
Carry is a quiet, powerful force. It doesn’t care about your valuation model or your macro view. It just asks: if prices don’t move, who gets paid?
Disclaimer
This document does not constitute advice or a recommendation or offer to sell or a solicitation to deal in any security or financial product. It is provided for information purposes only and on the understanding that the recipient has sufficient knowledge and experience to be able to understand and make their own evaluation of the proposals and services described herein, any risks associated therewith and any related legal, tax, accounting, or other material considerations. To the extent that the reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to their specific portfolio or situation, prospective investors are encouraged to contact HTAA or consult with the professional advisor of their choosing.
Except where otherwise indicated, the information contained in this article is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation of such material and not as of the date of distribution of any future date. Recipients should not rely on this material in making any future investment decision.
LEAVE A COMMENT