There is a paper by Engelberg, McClean, and Pontiff called “Anomalies and News”.
The full paper is worth reading, but the summary is that they find that “anomaly” returns are seven times higher on earnings announcement days and 2 times higher on corporate news days. In total they look at 97 (!) anomalies that have been documented in peer-reviewed papers using data from 1979 to 2013 (the anomalies are detailed in another paper by McClean and Pontiff, “Does academic research destroy stock return predictability?“) but a (very) non-exhaustive list includes:
The magnification of the returns applies to both longs and shorts, and don’t seem to be the result of data snooping.
They also document another effect: analysts tend to underestimate the returns to stocks that the anomalies suggest are good (e.g., value, small cap, etc.) and overestimate the returns for shorts (e.g., growth and large cap stocks). This is another reason to expect these effects to persist into the future.
Often investors think that they should avoid times where there is clear risk. Earnings are an example for individual stocks, and Federal Reserve announcements would be a case that applies to indices and bonds. This is wrong. We get paid for risk and these days are the best to be in stocks.
If you want to harvest a risk premium, you need to take risk.
Disclaimer
This document does not constitute advice or a recommendation or offer to sell or a solicitation to deal in any security or financial product. It is provided for information purposes only and on the understanding that the recipient has sufficient knowledge and experience to be able to understand and make their own evaluation of any proposals or services described herein, any risks associated therewith, and any related legal, tax, accounting, or other material considerations. To the extent that the reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to their specific portfolio or situation, prospective investors are encouraged to contact HTAA or consult with the professional advisor of their choosing.
Except where otherwise indicated, the information contained in this article is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation of such material and not as of the date of distribution of any future date. Recipients should not rely on this material in making any future investment decision.
LEAVE A COMMENT